login | register
Fri 09 of May, 2008 [15:48 UTC]

voip-info.org

Search with Google
Search this site with Google. Results may not include recent changes.
 
Google Ads
Shoutbox
  • Nick Barnes, Fri 09 of May, 2008 [11:36 UTC]: Christopher - yesterday I tried an Asterisk install on a CentOS 5.1 box with stock GUI and it all worked fine. Sorry I can't help.
  • aero, Fri 09 of May, 2008 [08:20 UTC]: can someone help me out on this, i tried to play some sound files on my asterisk box and this is the error message i got. WARNING[4429]: format_wav.c:169 check_header: Unexpected freqency 22050 May 8 11:17:39 WARNING[4433]: codec_gsm.c:194 gsmtolin_fra
  • Christopher Faust, Thu 08 of May, 2008 [14:15 UTC]: I beleive that I may have to change something in the xserver configuration. Please advise
  • Christopher Faust, Thu 08 of May, 2008 [14:14 UTC]: Everything was perfect. In the bios I have increased the memory allocated Still receive input not supported on my display.
  • Christopher Faust, Thu 08 of May, 2008 [14:13 UTC]: This would not be my main box. I am doing some testing to see if I can install zaptel and asterisk 1.4 on a full centos 5.1 box with development software Its bizzare, because before I went through the asterisk and zaptel installation everything was perfe
  • Nick Barnes, Thu 08 of May, 2008 [13:44 UTC]: Christopher - I can't see any way in which an Asterisk installation would muck your GUI, but remember that it is advised not to use a GUI on an Asterisk box anyway.
  • Christopher Faust, Wed 07 of May, 2008 [15:28 UTC]: When I try to startx I ge input not supported. Though before installing asterisk I had no video issue to start the GUI
  • Christopher Faust, Wed 07 of May, 2008 [15:26 UTC]: Hi Nick, I got centos 5.1 and asterisk up But now I cannot start startx I have set the depth from 24 to 16 for the video i810 driver for the i845 on my netvista machine but I cannot start GNOME. Please advise
  • Nick Barnes, Wed 07 of May, 2008 [10:01 UTC]: Howard - You'll need to provide a lot more information if you really want help.
  • Nick Barnes, Wed 07 of May, 2008 [10:00 UTC]: Christopher - Search the Wiki and you'll find a page I wrote detailing exactly what you have to do for Asterisk 1.4 + CentOS 5.1.
Server Stats
  • Execution time: 0.50s
  • Memory usage: 2.19MB
  • Database queries: 29
  • GZIP: Disabled
  • Server load: 0.91

Asterisk bounty SIP simultaneous registry

Contributions

Manager: None
Bounty: $350 USD
Date opened: July 10, 2004
Contributors: Kannaiyan nkans AT speak2world DOT com ($25), Dean dean AT collins DOT net DOT pr ($25), Jason Sjobeck jason at sjobeck dot com ($25) tgj AT dangaard DOT com ($200)

Detail

Allow a SIP device to register more than once so a single extension may exist in multiple locations.

Yes, Yes I know you could do all sorts of fun with the dialplan to produce a similar effect, but I still would like to be able to do this.

I have some users with a 7960 who are administrative assistants who monitor calls for 3 or 4 other people. It'd be nice to have two line instances for them, and one for the person(s) whom they assist.

Contact me: djimenez at pobox.com if you're interested in making this happen.



I have users that get an account on my PBX.

I really don't care how many phones they want to use, hardware phones on their desktop or soft phones on their laptop while travelling. It's still a user with one account. When the PBX dials them, all their phones should ring.

Asterisk doesn't really bother with *users*, it has a device-centric view of life, universe and propably everything. With Asterisk, the user has to call me each time he wants a new device connected and I have to reconfigure his setup.

If I had support for multiple registrations on one peer account, the peer would become a user account instead of a device. And the user could add as many devices as he wanted (up to a defined limit) without bothering the administrator. I guess that's why a lot of people ask for this function.

However, since Asterisk doesn't really bother with a user concept, we really have to teach Asterisk about users. And user groups. Life is much more than hardware, little Asterisk :-)

I've been discussing this many times, and so has many other people. I think we need an elegant way of defining users to asterisk so we connect peers, users, agents and mailboxes to a *user* with one set of credentials. If you look into your Asterisk configuration, you will find that there are users and credentials for logging in everywhere. It's not easy to maintain at all.

After a lot of discussions on the IRC, I'm convinced that we at some point in time have to add ast_auth - a common infrastructure for handling users and authentication.

This is a good topic for the Asterisk Developer's Day at Astricon. Let's bring it up on the agenda - A new user and authentication structure for Asterisk.

/Olle


Asterisk bounty
Created by cuban, Last modification by cuban on Fri 11 of Feb, 2005 [16:15 UTC]

Comments Filter

user centric view

by Walt on Wednesday 20 of September, 2006 [16:21:17 UTC]
I use AgentCallBackLogin just fine for anywhere users

2XXX are the users
3XXX are the voicemails

the rest is just dialplan stuff even one touch voicemail is seemless and re-invites are easy (now that we have all the agent variables accessable from the dialplan)

by Tommy McNeely on Wednesday 19 of July, 2006 [19:45:45 UTC]
I get hit by this too. having to create multiple accounts for each user and having several places to add one "user" account is maddening. SER adds another layer of complexity and doesn't fix IAX. SER seems to understand the concept of one user account being registered multiple times (desktop, laptop, hard phone in the office, hard phone at home, etc etc) and ring all the lines when they get a call.. all registered lines, what a concept :)

~tommy

is not this the proxy

by sjobeck on Tuesday 19 of July, 2005 [16:08:12 UTC]
(:question:)

Do I understand correctly, that this is the function of the SIP proxy (ie: sipproxd or SER)? I wonder if this will ever be added to Asterisk if it contained a large reproduction of SER (which is already well down the road of development) inside of Asterisk.

Thoughts?

Thanks.

Jason

Please update this page with new information, just login and click on the "Edit" or "Add Comment" button above. Get a free login here: Register Thanks! - support@voip-info.org

Page Changes | Comments

Sponsored by:

Terms of Service Privacy Policy
© 2003-2008 VOIP-Info.org LLC

Powered by bitweaver