login | register
Sat 17 of May, 2008 [06:40 UTC]

voip-info.org

Search with Google
Search this site with Google. Results may not include recent changes.
 
Google Ads
Shoutbox
  • Juan Ortega, Thu 15 of May, 2008 [10:33 UTC]: Hi everybody, I'm Juan, an ITCom student, and I need to know what basic elements I need to create a VoIP network. Can anybody helpme, please?,Thank you very much
  • gineta, Wed 14 of May, 2008 [03:58 UTC]: any here not fine the configuration of firewall juniper -screem for VOIP asterisk????
  • Anoop Prabhakaran, Tue 13 of May, 2008 [12:16 UTC]: I am developing Asterisk IVR, Whenever i make a internation call to the IVR system, the DTMF is not getting detected properly, this happens only for the first time, second call onwards system works fine. why this is happening
  • joe, Mon 12 of May, 2008 [04:27 UTC]: Is there an opensource browser based softphone, or a system like Busta where everything is not manages through their website?
  • Nick Barnes, Fri 09 of May, 2008 [11:36 UTC]: Christopher - yesterday I tried an Asterisk install on a CentOS 5.1 box with stock GUI and it all worked fine. Sorry I can't help.
  • aero, Fri 09 of May, 2008 [08:20 UTC]: can someone help me out on this, i tried to play some sound files on my asterisk box and this is the error message i got. WARNING[4429]: format_wav.c:169 check_header: Unexpected freqency 22050 May 8 11:17:39 WARNING[4433]: codec_gsm.c:194 gsmtolin_fra
  • Christopher Faust, Thu 08 of May, 2008 [14:15 UTC]: I beleive that I may have to change something in the xserver configuration. Please advise
  • Christopher Faust, Thu 08 of May, 2008 [14:14 UTC]: Everything was perfect. In the bios I have increased the memory allocated Still receive input not supported on my display.
  • Christopher Faust, Thu 08 of May, 2008 [14:13 UTC]: This would not be my main box. I am doing some testing to see if I can install zaptel and asterisk 1.4 on a full centos 5.1 box with development software Its bizzare, because before I went through the asterisk and zaptel installation everything was perfe
  • Nick Barnes, Thu 08 of May, 2008 [13:44 UTC]: Christopher - I can't see any way in which an Asterisk installation would muck your GUI, but remember that it is advised not to use a GUI on an Asterisk box anyway.
Server Stats
  • Execution time: 0.39s
  • Memory usage: 2.24MB
  • Database queries: 33
  • GZIP: Disabled
  • Server load: 0.83

VoipJet

http://www.voipjet.com

VoipJet Inc. delivers guaranteed quality Voice-over-IP termination.
Instant online test account setup, with 25 cents free to test.

You can fund your account with PayPal, and payments are instantly credited to your account. No minimums.
Activation is right away, and you'll be calling in no time.
All deposits less then $500 are subject to a 3% + 30 cents processing and handling fee (it's the fees that they are charged by paypal)


Setting up is easy. On their Accounts screen they 'll have personalized settings for you (with your username and passwords right in the page with your asterisk settings)

But here they are just for those who need a quick reference:



Peer1 East Coast Server (recommended): 64.34.45.100
NAC East Coast Server: 216.118.117.46
NAC East Coast Server II: 66.246.220.19
InterNap West Coast Server: 69.25.60.30
(Choose depending on your location)

For Asterisk@Home AMP see this screenshot. For the regular Asterisk PBX setup, see below:

Asterisk PBX Step 1: Add the following lines to the end of iax.conf (found in /etc/asterisk)

[voipjet]
type=peer
host= 216.118.117.46
secret= {{ this is your password, see your website for setup }}
auth=md5
notransfer=yes
context=default

Step 2: Add the following to extensions.conf (found in /etc/asterisk)

NANPA
North American Numbers dialed as 1 + area code

; For example, the New York Public Library is dialed as 12123400849
; 1 (North American call) 212 (New York area code) 3400849 (libary's phone number)
WORLD
International Numbers dialed as 011 + country code + number

; For example, the Tate Modern Museum in London, U.K. is dialed as 011442078878000
; 011 (International call) 44 (U.K. country code) 2078878000 (museum's number)
; Finally, the number just before @voipjet in the Dial string is your VoipJet userid #

exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,1,SetCallerID(4153574000); Set your CallerID as a ten digit number like this. See our FAQ
exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,2,Dial,IAX2/2135@voipjet/${EXTEN} ; VoipJet.com NANPA
exten => _011.,1,SetCallerID(4153574000); Set your CallerID as a ten digit number like this. See our FAQ.
exten => _011.,2,Dial,IAX2/2135@voipjet/${EXTEN} ; VoipJet.com WORLD
;Do not change IAX2/2135 in the above two lines!

Step 3A (recommended):

; Set your codec to G.711 ulaw for optimal sound clarity and minimal transmission delay.
;They accept iLBC, and GSM Codecs
;In iax.conf (found in /etc/asterisk) locate the codec section and include the following only.
disallow=all ; Prevent all codecs...
allow = ulaw ; ...except G.711 ulaw
allow = ilbc ; ...except G.711 ulaw
allow = gsm ; ...except G.711 ulaw

Step 3B (recommended):

;Also in iax.conf, enable the jitter buffer. This section is usually immediately below the codecs section.
jitterbuffer=yes ; Jitter buffer enabled...
dropcount=1 ; ...to drop at most 0.5% of VoIP packets


Terms of Service

...
What protocols do you support?
IAX/IAX2 Inter-Asterisk Exchange for all customers. For larger carriers only, we support SIP and H323 interconnection.




VOIP Service Providers
Created by jht2, Last modification by dlublink on Wed 03 of Jan, 2007 [18:59 UTC]

Comments Filter

No VoipJet Support

by J Johnson on Wednesday 09 of April, 2008 [22:30:59 UTC]
As many have noted here, while the VoipJet service has largely been reliable, there support is HORRIBLE. We have been running several IAX2 carriers in an effort to select a new an IAX carrier for our customer traffic. Whnever problems do arise, they have never responded to a single e-mail. At least two other providers for which we work with have also had the same experience with them. It is not, given the circumstances of many experiences with them, NOT a business grade service and should be avoided.

No problems with VoIPJet so far

by William James on Sunday 21 of October, 2007 [01:53:45 UTC]
We have been using VoIPJet alongside trunks from Simple Signal and Bandwidth.com for a while and have been VERY happy with the quality of service, and the support the one time I needed it.

Friendly and fast response from fastsupport email and so far, very solid and consistent quality of service since day one with VoIPJet.

Highly recommended by HeliFreak.com


Problems with support in the past

by Interphoneline on Tuesday 11 of September, 2007 [23:35:35 UTC]
Although we had some problems in the past with their lack of support we did not change as their service have improved greatly in the past months.

We provide VoIP services for local companies based in Costa Rica and we mostly pass lots of trafic to china and south America and so far we are very happy with the quality of the calls with no disruptions with the service so far.

As they were the very first that we contactacted to offer IAX2 we stayed with VoiceJet and besides the problems in the past we are very pleased with their service now and if they improved a little on the support side, which they have, I am sure we will pass losts of business their way.




Nothing But Good Experience!

by Robert C. on Thursday 16 of August, 2007 [00:00:52 UTC]
I have been a VoipJet user for some time now, and I have had great results!<p>

When I first joined, I had a little trouble with getting my Asterisk, and I was able to get assistance right away. John worked with me to get my systems connected and working properly, and I have had perfect service ever since.<p>

The sound quality is clear, and I don't have any problem with echoes or delays like I've had with other providers.<p>

I really appreciate they excellent customer service they provide, I have never had any trouble getting a quick response any time I've had a question. John seems to really care about the company and the satisfaction of VoipJet customers, and I expect VoipJet to continue to be successful for a long time to come.<p>

- Robert

Am I the only one that's had good experiences with VJ ?

by Jacob Hawkins on Thursday 12 of July, 2007 [21:58:22 UTC]
I use VoipJet exclusively for US-48 termination, and I've only had a couple of small, isolated problems caused by my transport provider's inability to understand how their backside is different from their network (Time Warner - GUH.. YOU SUCK!)

Currently, I'm clearing between 70 and 80 thousand minutes a month through VJ, and the quality is excellent ( notwithstanding Time Warner's screwups). I had an issue today, that turned out to be totally unrelated to VJ's service, and John called me directly within minutes of firing off an e-mail to the fastsupport address. He was pleasant and was eager to assist me with the dial failures I was experiencing.

The few times I've had to e-mail them, I've gotten a quick response, within 5 to 10 minutes every time. Perhaps my experience is a singular one, but right now... I'm happy. I could do with a volume-based discount on rates, but you know :)

I'm in the middle of moving to a pair of T-1's with Verizon (IP trunking/MPLS-enabled trunking, w/e they call it) and the issues with Time Warner will stop. I'm sure at that point, I will have even better things to say.

Jacob W. Hawkins, CCNP
Midwest Technology Industries
http://www.mtindiana.com
National: 888-817-2944
Local: 317-454-0450
MTI: The Voice of the Future

Very Bad Support

by modulis on Wednesday 09 of May, 2007 [17:14:08 UTC]
Hi,

I, and my customers sent emails to "fast"support@voipjet.com and we never got any reply !

Quality to france is also extremely bad.

Adrien

Works Great if you DON'T CHANGE THE CONFIG automatically generated for you

by helios3 on Sunday 06 of May, 2007 [00:43:11 UTC]
VoipJet works perfect if you don't change the config automatically generated for you. 99% of problems is due to this.

VoipJet offers pure Level-3 bandwidth in 60 Hudson (New York) and One Wilshire (Los Angeles). It has one of the highest CallerID transmission rates. Everyone agrees VoipJet sounds the best.

So don't change the config and be happy.

Nonexistent customer service

by Ross Dykes on Tuesday 19 of December, 2006 [22:58:16 UTC]
I would strongly advise against using Voipjet, we used them up until early December when we started having problems with calls not going through. Asterisk could communicate with their servers, the phone you were calling would ring, but you could not hear anything on either phone and the connection would not terminate on the receiving end if you hung up or disconnected Asterisk on our end. After several e-mail messages, I finally got a response from John that he was looking into the problem but he didn't find anything wrong. I e-mailed him several times after that for a status update, with no response. Their is no contact information other than "fastsupport@voipjet.com" and "carrier@voipjet.com" listed on their website, and from the threads in this forum it doesn't look like they respond to e-mail in a timely fashion. Anyone know where they are based and how to contact them?


- Ross.

Ridiculous TOS

by Ben on Thursday 02 of November, 2006 [23:08:44 UTC]
I'd be tempted to try voipjet, except for their ridiculous TOS. It includes such gems as:

"IT IS SPECIFICALLY FORBIDDEN TO USE THIS SERVICE FOR EMERGENCY, MEDICAL, FINANCIAL, GOVERNMENTAL CALLS OR ANY OTHER IMPORTANT CALLS."

What *isn't* an important call?

"NON-DISCLOSURE: ALL CUSTOMERS USING VOIPJET'S SERVICE ARE SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED FROM DISCLOSING TO OTHERS THAT THEY USE VOIPJET'S SERVICE..."

So all of you mentioning that you use Voipjet are violating your TOS. Nice!

"The customer acknowledges that the service may not be working for some, most or all of the time."

"AGAIN, THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL AND HIGHLY UNRELIABLE SERVICE."

That's nice, then why should I pay for it? If this is the dawn of intelligent VoIP, I'm disappointed.

"VOIPJET DOES NOT SUGGEST, AND VEHEMENTLY DENIES, ANY CLAIM THAT ITS VOIP SERVICES HAVE A LEVEL OF QUALITY OR RELIABILITY ANYWHERE NEAR THAT OF THE REGULAR PHONE SYSTEM."

It's the "anywhere near" part that scares me.

Re: No Response to emails!

by Rodney Wild on Saturday 02 of September, 2006 [21:14:03 UTC]
Well as much as I would love to use their service, I prefer to use wire transfers to get my money where it is going and voipjet says to email them for the info but .... three emails and no one is home.

I ask myself this .... what would happen if I had a $1000.00 credit and then the service suddenly stoped working and every time that I send them an email they did not respond .... not cool.

Please update this page with new information, just login and click on the "Edit" or "Add Comment" button above. Get a free login here: Register Thanks! - support@voip-info.org

Page Changes | Comments

Sponsored by:

Terms of Service Privacy Policy
© 2003-2008 VOIP-Info.org LLC

Powered by bitweaver