Halea
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,155
- Reaction score
- 895
I've searched on this forum and FreePBX's and found several discussion threads about my question below, but I still don't have a good understanding about the riskiness of doing what I am trying to do.
In a nutshell, there are a dozen of SIP URIs that I want my PBX users to be able to call via the standard extension numbering scheme. I would configure those custom extensions to use the "PJSIP/anonymous/sip:nnnn@<fqdn>" format.
I don't want any random or unauthenticated sip uri calls into my PBX.
What are the inherent risks of setting
"Allow Anonymous Inbound SIP Calls" to NO, while setting
"Allow SIP Guests" to YES
under "IncrediblePBX WebGUI > Settings > Asterisk SIP Settings > General SIP Settings > Security Settings" ?
In a nutshell, there are a dozen of SIP URIs that I want my PBX users to be able to call via the standard extension numbering scheme. I would configure those custom extensions to use the "PJSIP/anonymous/sip:nnnn@<fqdn>" format.
I don't want any random or unauthenticated sip uri calls into my PBX.
What are the inherent risks of setting
"Allow Anonymous Inbound SIP Calls" to NO, while setting
"Allow SIP Guests" to YES
under "IncrediblePBX WebGUI > Settings > Asterisk SIP Settings > General SIP Settings > Security Settings" ?