I am finding that if I try to tunnel Hamachi over a total of three NATs (two NATs at the remote end, plus a third NAT which my main PBX sits behind) then it doesn't work.
It works beautifully with the remote PIAF/VPNinaflash machine behind just one NAT and the main server behind another (so two in total)
The reason I'd want to introduce another NAT is that I need to use the remote PBX in a location where it will be on an untrusted network. So what I thought I would do is sit the remote PIAF and extensions behind their own router to isolate them from the untrusted network - hoping the Hamachi tunnel would get through to the main PBX. The other advantage of this would have been being able to give the remote PIAF a fixed IP address - to make the whole setup of VPNinaflash and remote extensions plug-and-play.
But this doesn't seem to work. Maybe this is obvious (?).
Would anyone happen to know of a solution to this?
Many thanks
It works beautifully with the remote PIAF/VPNinaflash machine behind just one NAT and the main server behind another (so two in total)
The reason I'd want to introduce another NAT is that I need to use the remote PBX in a location where it will be on an untrusted network. So what I thought I would do is sit the remote PIAF and extensions behind their own router to isolate them from the untrusted network - hoping the Hamachi tunnel would get through to the main PBX. The other advantage of this would have been being able to give the remote PIAF a fixed IP address - to make the whole setup of VPNinaflash and remote extensions plug-and-play.
But this doesn't seem to work. Maybe this is obvious (?).
Would anyone happen to know of a solution to this?
Many thanks
