
This is probably a very basic (stupid) question but I've looked and haven't yet found the reason... IAX uses a single port for everything and from what I have read, is much better at traversing NAT, etc. while keeping audio intact. And it seems to have other advantages over SIP. If this isn't correct, please help me to better understand.
So then why is using a SIP softphone vs. an IAX softphone better? Or what I'm actually asking is what is the advantage of using a remote SIP softphone instead of a remote IAX softphone?
And if using an IAX softphone, shouldn't/couldn't something akin to traveling man be used to open that port for only when it is needed by the legitimate remote IAX softphones? That way iptables could also protect the IAX port.
Thanks,
Don
I have to agree with you on that one. Yuck! No one ever accused Mitel phones of being esthetically pleasing.