GOOD NEWS Incredible PBX for CentOS 6.7

[wardmundy]

New Incredible PBX 11 and 13 releases for CentOS 6.7 with the latest versions of Asterisk 11 and 13 are now available. Tutorials have also been updated.

Asterisk 13 Tutorial

Asterisk 11 Tutorial

NOTE: The Python update in CentOS 6.7 is broken at the moment. Use: yum -y upgrade --skip-broken

 

[ppmax]

Hi Ward--

Thanks for the quick response! I hustled home and tried everything again...but part way through executing ./IncrediblePBX* the script exits out with this error:

./IncrediblePBX11-12.sh: line 140: syntax error near unexpected token `fi'
./IncrediblePBX11-12.sh: line 140: `fi'

Checking the install script I see there may be an issue with the items in red...as you can see everything inbetween else and fi is commented out.

if [[ "$release" = "7" ]]; then
ln -s /usr/lib/systemd/system/mariadb.service /usr/lib/systemd/system/mysqld.service
echo "#\!/bin/bash" > /etc/init.d/mysqld
sed -i 's|\\||' /etc/init.d/mysqld
echo "service mariadb \$1" >> /etc/init.d/mysqld
chmod +x /etc/init.d/mysqld
chkconfig --levels 235 mariadb on
else
# rpm -Uvh https://mirror.webtatic.com/yum/el6/latest.rpm
# yum -y install mysql.`uname -i` yum-plugin-replace
# yum -y replace mysql --replace-with mysql55w
# service mysqld start
fi
chkconfig --levels 235 mysqld on

I commented out else, then re-ran ./IncrediblePBX* and it looks like I'm off to the races again...

thx
PP

 

[wardmundy]

Thanks, ppmax. I HATE that "feature" of bash. No reason that should blow up, but it does. In fact, it's the only programming language of which I'm aware in which walking through commented out code can generate an error condition. Anyway, it's been fixed.

Initially, we thought we were going to need a workaround for MySQL, but that turned out to not be the case. So... the commented out code only appeared in the 11-12 version which we worked on first. Judging by last night's downloads, many folks have moved to Asterisk 13.

 

[ppmax]

Thanks again Ward--

Should I run that chunk of code separately now that I'm up and running?

best,
PP

 

[wardmundy]

Thanks again Ward--

Should I run that chunk of code separately now that I'm up and running?

best,
PP

Noooo. Not required as it turned out.